It is impossible to watch this video of Robert Kennedy breaking the news of Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination to an Indianapolis crowd without knowing that combination of grace, wisdom and pragmatism that spoke from the heart to the hearts of so many would be gone so soon. And yet … and yet, it is impossible not to watch without a glimmer of hope that the ineffably awful doesn’t have to mean the end of what is right. (via Upworthy)
Saturday afternoon NASCAR set off a social media storm when it used — technically, abused — the DCMA YouTube takedown tool to block a quickly spreading fan video of a horrific crash at Daytona. NASCAR admitted late that afternoon that the takedown was about controlling the video, saying it was a matter of “respect” for the 30-plus injured fans, while YouTube reversed the block within hours because it was not “copyright infringing.”
Now Marc Jenkins, NASCAR vice president of digital media, has explained the racing league’s actions to the Washington Post‘s Erik Wemple. Jenkins told Wemple they used the copyright takedown as the only available way to stop the Tyler Anderson video out of caution, not because it was a copyright violation. He’d also really rather we don’t see it as censorship or as routine.
So what is NASCAR’s usual policy for fan multimedia? Jenkins told Wemple:
Jenkins didn’t apologize or say it wouldn’t be repeated, although I doubt NASCAR would do so again by abusing its YouTube takedown power unless it legitimately can claim copyright infringement.
What happened Saturday shows, though, that the policy holds only as long as NASCAR approves of what the fan is doing or is willing to tolerate. As I wrote then:
If NASCAR wants the boost from social media, as it clearly does given its interaction on Twitter, Facebook and other places, it should go all in.
Here’s Tyler’s video:
And another grand plan by major publishers bites the dust. Tribune, Gannett, the New York Times Co. and Hearst have shut down quadrantOne effective immediately. The agency was an attempt to scale local for national display advertising, harnessing the power of the four owners and others. The abrupt website notice:
Important Information About quadrantONE
To all of our valued partners:
As a result of the many changes that have occurred in the digital advertising marketplace over the last several years, the owner companies of quadrantONE have decided to seek different paths for national display advertising. As a result, quadrantONE will wind down current operations.
We’d like to take this opportunity thank all of our affiliate and advertising partners who have worked with us over the last 5 years. It has simply been our pleasure to serve you.
The quadrantONE Team
Chicago-based QuadrantOne launched five years ago this month as some of the leading newspaper publishers looked for ways to capitalize on their local reach by providing advertisers with ways to target across organizations. Joint ventures, particularly in the competitive media space, are notoriously difficult. Often the betting is on how long they will last, rather than can they succeed. In that respect, Q1 went a little longer than I might have expected, especially with Tribune’s financial woes and the management changes across the various companies.
Update: David Kaplan, who covered quadrantOne in depth for paidContent and knows the ad exchange biz upside down and sideways, has a piece up now at AdExchanger:
One cause, according to sources, was bickering among JV partners, including over the investment they would be willing to contribute to the company going forward. …
The disintegration could – in part – be attributed to growing internal programmatic strategies that create better yield than the assumed scale of the co-operative. Also, this may be a sign that exchanges are creating better yield these days. Why manage a separate exchange when you can go through existing exchanges such as Google’s DoubleClick Ad Exchange, PubMatic, Rubicon Project, AppNexus and so on, and receive comparable or better CPMs.
See comment above about JVs being “notoriously difficult” — then add in the usual problems of startups and the rapidly changing ad marketplace.
Disclosure: My brother Billy Kramer worked for quadrantOne in 2010-11 but is not one of those who lost their jobs with no warning today.
The Journal News hired armed guards after its staff was threatened for posting names and address of gun owners. The New York Times has some (automated) shopping advice to go with the armed guards. The wire story in the screengrab* isn’t showing up now and probably shouldn’t have been posted since it repeats a staff article from earlier today.
*Image courtesy of eagle-eyed Ed Kohn.
The Dropkick Murphys played a holiday set at the hometown Boston Globe Digital Lab in early December. I’d prefer the full concert but that may be a minority view. Instead, it’s a video playlist with individual songs, including the classic Irish Rover (embedded below).
This should have taken a couple of minutes to post. Instead, I learned a lot more about the limits of WordPress.com video and the vageries of the Brightcove player then I could have imagined. The solution I went with meant skipping the manual embed that would give me more control over the post, giving the player access to my WordPress account and publishing immediately, then going into the post to update. It’s also a dead-end video sans playlist. Oh, well, the results still rock.
Why? I explain as part of the Nieman Jopurnalism Lab 2013 predictions project. (Thanks for including me, Josh.) Lots more on a variety of topics from much smarter people.
An unwillingness to upgrade to iOS 6 has landed me in Apple’s software baby jail – a virtual playpen where I can go only so far without permission or swearing allegiance to the iOS flag. I can’t upgrade iPhoto or certain other apps unless I upgrade to flawed iOS6. Irksome but I can live with that until I’m ready to make the switch. Worse, no matter how much I’ve invested in Apple devices — hint: typing this on my third MacBook Air 11” about an issue discovered on iPad 3 while iPhone 4S on the table – or iTunes apps, I can’t upgrade an app I’ve already paid for unless I accept the latest change in iTunes terms and conditions. This is on top of producing a new iOS that double-dog dares you not to install it because, as is so often the case with Apple, improvements and breakage come in the same package. (Before anyone jumps on me, I know Apple isn’t alone in breaking features but it leads the pack in making life without OS upgrades difficult. Try watching an Apple video without the latest version of Quicktime.)
It isn’t a new frustration but it’s a reminder of the kind of thinking that sent me to Microsoft and DOS from Apple IIC years ago. Apple’s version of the walled garden is considerably broader than it was back then when I went over the wall because it blocked the kind of software development encouraged by Microsoft. But it’s still a control freak’s paradise that requires a series of “Mother, may I’s” or “Please, sir, may I have anothers?” Today I blend them – I’m using Windows 7 on this MacBook Air and our other household computers are PCs. Every time I think about diving in, say going Mac for my new desktop, I run into a reminder that life in the virtual playpen is meant to work best when you don’t challenge the limits.