<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Trust But Verify</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sdkramer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sdkramer.com</link>
	<description>journalism, technology, sports and life -- online and off -- from the mixed-up files of Staci D. Kramer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:23:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NASCAR&#8217;s  Social Media #FAIL by NASCAR explains wreck-video blockage &#124; legalprocessoutsourcing.ca</title>
		<link>http://sdkramer.com/2013/02/23/nascars-social-media-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NASCAR explains wreck-video blockage &#124; legalprocessoutsourcing.ca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdkramer.com/?p=7235#comment-99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] this very embrace of social media that prompted commentator Staci D. Kramer to remark, “If you want the boost from social media, need to take it [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this very embrace of social media that prompted commentator Staci D. Kramer to remark, “If you want the boost from social media, need to take it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NASCAR&#8217;s  Social Media #FAIL by NASCAR Exec Says Crash Video Takedown Was Exception, Not Rule &#124; Trust But Verify</title>
		<link>http://sdkramer.com/2013/02/23/nascars-social-media-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NASCAR Exec Says Crash Video Takedown Was Exception, Not Rule &#124; Trust But Verify]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdkramer.com/?p=7235#comment-98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] afternoon NASCAR set off a social media storm when it used &#8212; technically, abused &#8212; the DCMA takedown [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] afternoon NASCAR set off a social media storm when it used &#8212; technically, abused &#8212; the DCMA takedown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NASCAR&#8217;s  Social Media #FAIL by NASCAR explains wreck-video blockage</title>
		<link>http://sdkramer.com/2013/02/23/nascars-social-media-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NASCAR explains wreck-video blockage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdkramer.com/?p=7235#comment-97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] this very embrace of social media that prompted commentator Staci D. Kramer to remark, &#8220;If you want the boost from social media, need to take it [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this very embrace of social media that prompted commentator Staci D. Kramer to remark, &#8220;If you want the boost from social media, need to take it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NASCAR&#8217;s  Social Media #FAIL by NASCAR&#8217;s YouTube Problem - GEEKKENYA</title>
		<link>http://sdkramer.com/2013/02/23/nascars-social-media-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NASCAR&#8217;s YouTube Problem - GEEKKENYA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdkramer.com/?p=7235#comment-96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] are inescapable contradictions between a asserting a legal claim over recording everything that happens in a certain place, and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are inescapable contradictions between a asserting a legal claim over recording everything that happens in a certain place, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aaron Swartz, Eugene Patterson and the Legacy of Ralph McGill by Larry Lessig on &#8216;Aaron&#8217;s Laws: Law and Justice in a Digital Age&#8217; &#124; Trust But Verify</title>
		<link>http://sdkramer.com/2013/02/21/beleaguered-on/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Lessig on &#8216;Aaron&#8217;s Laws: Law and Justice in a Digital Age&#8217; &#124; Trust But Verify]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdkramer.com/?p=6781#comment-86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Related: Aaron Swartz, Eugene Patterson and the Legacy of Ralph McGill [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related: Aaron Swartz, Eugene Patterson and the Legacy of Ralph McGill [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CBS Limits On CNET Editorial Independence Cause More Damage by &#8220;&#8230; I did not &#8230; &#171; Trust But Verify</title>
		<link>http://sdkramer.com/2013/01/14/cbs-limits-on-cnet-editorial-independence-cause-more-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#8220;&#8230; I did not &#8230; &#171; Trust But Verify]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 04:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdkramer.com/?p=3913#comment-84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;&#8230; I did not say this thing did not affect the CNET brand. I said that CBS was the brand that took the blame for what happened. Not disputing there was an effect on the CNET brand as a result of what happened. Nor are we saying we will just blink our eyes and act like this never happened. Just said we can get through it. &#8221; &#8212; CBSi President Jim Lanzone in internal message to CBSi staffers via Jim Romenesko, who has the latest on this increasingly toxic situation. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;&#8230; I did not say this thing did not affect the CNET brand. I said that CBS was the brand that took the blame for what happened. Not disputing there was an effect on the CNET brand as a result of what happened. Nor are we saying we will just blink our eyes and act like this never happened. Just said we can get through it. &#8221; &#8212; CBSi President Jim Lanzone in internal message to CBSi staffers via Jim Romenesko, who has the latest on this increasingly toxic situation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Euphoria, Then Sadness by PSoTD</title>
		<link>http://sdkramer.com/2006/01/04/euphoria_then_s/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PSoTD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 07:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacidk.wordpress.com/2006/01/04/euphoria_then_s#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Cruel Ineptitude&lt;/strong&gt;

There are a lot of people that ought to feel very guilty about last night&#039;s reversal of news in the West Virginia mine accident, but CNN and MSNBC should be publicly i...
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cruel Ineptitude</strong></p>
<p>There are a lot of people that ought to feel very guilty about last night&#8217;s reversal of news in the West Virginia mine accident, but CNN and MSNBC should be publicly i&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tsunami Revisited: Evelyn Rodriguez by Staci Kramer</title>
		<link>http://sdkramer.com/2005/12/24/tsunami_revisit/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staci Kramer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacidk.wordpress.com/2005/12/24/tsunami_revisit#comment-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for taking the time to write, Evelyn. Knowing when to stop reporting and when to start writing can be hard enough without having to factor in the emotional connection.  As much as I want to read about your experiences, the most important thing is that you are having them. I hope that makes sense to you.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to write, Evelyn. Knowing when to stop reporting and when to start writing can be hard enough without having to factor in the emotional connection.  As much as I want to read about your experiences, the most important thing is that you are having them. I hope that makes sense to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tsunami Revisited: Evelyn Rodriguez by Evelyn Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://sdkramer.com/2005/12/24/tsunami_revisit/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evelyn Rodriguez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacidk.wordpress.com/2005/12/24/tsunami_revisit#comment-5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Stacy so much for your donation and more importantly knowing you care. What I&#039;m really finding is that post-disaster story was easy to tell. Fairly black-and-white, but there is much more nuances, layers and complexity now a year later. A wide variety of responses and reactions individually as well as community and nationwide aid and recovery efforts that run the gamut.
Being a participative journalist is much harder than I imagined. And much richer too. I feel like I&#039;m spending too much of my time today in the press center. And alternatively, I was feeling guilty that I was spending too much of my time rest of the week experiencing, conversing and gathering material. And not writing. How to do both well?
Much of the media on the morning of the Dec 26th ceremony swoops in for a half-hour soundbite and files their dispatch and off they go. I&#039;m not sure how you really capture what&#039;s happened to this island and its people in the past year that way. I&#039;ve spent five days on this island - not to mention last year and my first time 14 years ago - and I feel I&#039;ve only scratched the surface.
Well, it&#039;s a rewarding challenge anyway. Thanks!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stacy so much for your donation and more importantly knowing you care. What I&#8217;m really finding is that post-disaster story was easy to tell. Fairly black-and-white, but there is much more nuances, layers and complexity now a year later. A wide variety of responses and reactions individually as well as community and nationwide aid and recovery efforts that run the gamut.<br />
Being a participative journalist is much harder than I imagined. And much richer too. I feel like I&#8217;m spending too much of my time today in the press center. And alternatively, I was feeling guilty that I was spending too much of my time rest of the week experiencing, conversing and gathering material. And not writing. How to do both well?<br />
Much of the media on the morning of the Dec 26th ceremony swoops in for a half-hour soundbite and files their dispatch and off they go. I&#8217;m not sure how you really capture what&#8217;s happened to this island and its people in the past year that way. I&#8217;ve spent five days on this island &#8211; not to mention last year and my first time 14 years ago &#8211; and I feel I&#8217;ve only scratched the surface.<br />
Well, it&#8217;s a rewarding challenge anyway. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Changing Linguistic Gears by Seth de l'Isle</title>
		<link>http://sdkramer.com/2005/06/13/changing_lingui/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth de l'Isle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 02:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stacidk.wordpress.com/2005/06/13/changing_lingui#comment-64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Citizen Journalism&quot; seems to have more mind share; it might be too late to change that.  I would like to draw a distinction between two kinds of projects to which we might apply this label.  The first involves media companies who enlist the aid of their readers to improve on the news as a product, as you suggest:
&quot;...allowing folks nearest the ground, if you will, to provide the news directly to other readers.&quot;
Grassroots journalism implies a democratization of how a community chooses to understand current events.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Citizen Journalism&#8221; seems to have more mind share; it might be too late to change that.  I would like to draw a distinction between two kinds of projects to which we might apply this label.  The first involves media companies who enlist the aid of their readers to improve on the news as a product, as you suggest:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;allowing folks nearest the ground, if you will, to provide the news directly to other readers.&#8221;<br />
Grassroots journalism implies a democratization of how a community chooses to understand current events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
